Revision: Edition, January 1, ; Published Date: January ; Status: Active, Most Current; Document Language: English; Published By: ASME. 15 Feb Hi, I’m looking for: ASME STS Steel Stacks, if someone could upload it, would be greatly appreciated. Thank you very much in. Title, ASME STS Steel Stacks. Publisher, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. Length, 96 pages. Export Citation, BiBTeX EndNote RefMan.

Author: Zulukazahn Akinokasa
Country: Guadeloupe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 4 February 2017
Pages: 267
PDF File Size: 13.96 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.17 Mb
ISBN: 624-5-61973-575-6
Downloads: 54084
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mugul

And, we have been arguing this back and forth through this whole thread. Please fill this form, we will try to respond as soon as possible.

Ill take a look at asme sts 1 2011 tomorrow. I believe he said he’s the first guy in the office who ever really noticed this stipulation. Must go, but perhaps this will spark your thoughts. And here is where the above mentioned Loads, height, wind, eq, ice, etc all come into play We have the cases automated with excel and STAAD and I can see that the thickness provided by my European colleagues of mm are required at the base for this stack to pass design.

Please note that since this is the personal opinion of a committee member, it is not asme sts 1 2011 by ASME.

ASME STS Steel Stacks – Google Books

The allowable longitudinal compressive stresses due to vertical load and asme sts 1 2011 bending moment can be determined by: Notice the reference and similarities to the ASME. I have never seen a situation where thickening a plate made a buckling problem worse, at a given stress level, unless it changes the buckling from one mode to another, and their cases are based on the former. Table 4 systematises structural data, namely tss, mass and damping ratio defined according to the ASME STS specificationforce coefficients and importance asme sts 1 2011.


I am not familiar with this standard but the way I read section 4.

There certainly shouldn’t be anything embarrassing about asking that kind of question of them. I think you are asme sts 1 2011 about contacting ASME about this, but im still hoping im missing something obvious here. Do you need strakes on this stack? There will be a blip in our design criteria, and in our design approach asmee we move from one theoretical regime, or buckling regime to another.

And, I suspect that your FY should really be F gamma. Click Here to join Eng-Tips and talk with other members!

AISC doesn’t comment on non-compact sections in their table Adme. Asme sts 1 2011 Engineers, I am running into an international difference in steel stack design. Artificial intelligence AI has recently become a field in which research is proceeding at a feverish pace. Can anyone comment in agreement or disagreement with the above methodology?

Design of stacks

This makes no sense to me. Detailed colour maps of stresses in the lower part of the stack for the heated and corroded condition are further represented in Figure 11 to illustrate the small amplitudes observed in that part of the chimney.

I have brough this issue to 3 asme sts 1 2011 4 of our senior US structural engineers and they have all be puzzled by this mostly by the fact that they havnt noticed this stipulation in previous designs.

Design loads and the methodology of analysis were defined according to the ASCE code. April 26, The next edition of this Standard is scheduled for publication in Alternatively, t must increase if you want to work at a higher buckling stress, still less than. The significant discrepancy between the two approaches is explained by the very high overturning force at the top of the stack given by the static asme sts 1 2011, as a result of the very high mass of the supporting structure.


ASME STS-1 Steel-Stacks-2011.pdf

They don’t have your head scratcher, because they don’t worry about, or design from the standpoint of, thin shell elastic buckling. This is tellig me that my allow is. Asme sts 1 2011 in mind, this equation has no relation to loads, height, wind, eq, ect. You would still follow STS for other aspects of the design Vortex azme, etc.

I think you’re asme sts 1 2011 the right track now. Compression and Bending F. Students Click Here Join Us! Yes, my wording was poor in regards to table C Are you an Engineering professional? Most of this steel stack design is based in thin shell, thin plate theory, and the testing follows that, but we don’t know how to deal with, factor into the design, the big effect imperfections have on testing, and the real stack.

ASME STS-1 Steel-Stackspdf – Free Download PDF

As you go to thinner plate, the allowable asms equations will start needing to consider local buckling. My understanding of stack design has increased a good bit in this past week. Having this aspect into asme sts 1 2011, static equivalent forces were calculated according to defined in the ASME-STS code, in order to check the amplitudes of vibration and stresses.